Section 23.2 The Fundamental Theorem
The goal of this section is to prove the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory. This theorem explains the connection between the subgroups of and the intermediate fields between and
Proof.
Let and Then
and
If then Finally, and since is an automorphism.
Corollary 23.15.
The subfield of is called the fixed field of The field fixed by a subgroup of will be denoted by
Example 23.16.
Proposition 23.17.
Proof.
A large number of mathematicians first learned Galois theory from Emil Artinโs monograph on the subject [1]. The very clever proof of the following lemma is due to Artin.
Lemma 23.18.
Proof.
Let We must show that any set of elements in is linearly dependent over that is, we need to find elements not all zero, such that
Suppose that are the automorphisms in The homogeneous system of linear equations
has more unknowns than equations. From linear algebra we know that this system has a nontrivial solution, say for Since is the identity, the first equation translates to
The problem is that some of the โs may be in but not in We must show that this is impossible.
Suppose that at least one of the โs is in but not in By rearranging the โs we may assume that is nonzero. Since any nonzero multiple of a solution is also a solution, we can also assume that Of all possible solutions fitting this description, we choose the one with the smallest number of nonzero terms. Again, by rearranging if necessary, we can assume that is in but not in Since is the subfield of that is fixed elementwise by there exists a in such that Applying to each equation in the system, we end up with the same homogeneous system, since is a group. Therefore, is also a solution of the original system. We know that a linear combination of two solutions of a homogeneous system is also a solution; consequently,
must be another solution of the system. This is a nontrivial solution because and has fewer nonzero entries than our original solution. This is a contradiction, since the number of nonzero solutions to our original solution was assumed to be minimal. We can therefore conclude that
Let be an algebraic extension of If every irreducible polynomial in with a root in has all of its roots in then is called a normal extension of that is, every irreducible polynomial in containing a root in is the product of linear factors in
Theorem 23.19.
Proof.
(1) (2). Let be a finite, normal, separable extension of By the Primitive Element Theorem, we can find an in such that Let be the minimal polynomial of over The field must contain all of the roots of since it is a normal extension hence, is a splitting field for
(2) (3). Let be the splitting field over of a separable polynomial. By Proposition 23.17, Since this is a finite group.
(3) (1). Let for some finite group of automorphisms of Since is a finite extension of To show that is a finite, normal extension of let be an irreducible monic polynomial that has a root in We must show that is the product of distinct linear factors in By Proposition 23.5, automorphisms in permute the roots of lying in Hence, if we let act on we can obtain distinct roots in Let Then is separable over and Any automorphism in permutes the factors of since it permutes these roots; hence, when acts on it must fix the coefficients of Therefore, the coefficients of must be in Since and is the minimal polynomial of
Corollary 23.20.
Proof.
Since is a subgroup of Hence,
It follows that since they must have the same order.
Before we determine the exact correspondence between field extensions and automorphisms of fields, let us return to a familiar example.
Example 23.21.
In Example 23.4 we examined the automorphisms of fixing Figure 23.22 compares the lattice of field extensions of with the lattice of subgroups of The Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory tells us what the relationship is between the two lattices.
We are now ready to state and prove the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory.
Theorem 23.23. Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory.
Let be a finite field or a field of characteristic zero. If is a finite normal extension of with Galois group then the following statements are true.
- The map
is a bijection of subfields of containing with the subgroups of - If
then if and only if is a normal extension of if and only if is a normal subgroup of In this case
Proof.
(1) Suppose that Both and are fixed fields of hence, and the map defined by is one-to-one. To show that the map is onto, let be a subgroup of and be the field fixed by Then consequently, is a normal extension of Thus, and the map is a bijection.
Statement (3) is illustrated in Figure 23.24. We leave the proof of this property as an exercise.
(4) This part takes a little more work. Let be a normal extension of If is in and is in we need to show that is in that is, we need to show that for all Suppose that is the minimal polynomial of over Then is also a root of lying in since is a normal extension of Hence, or
Conversely, let be a normal subgroup of We need to show that Let For all there exists a such that Consequently, for all
hence, must be in the fixed field of Let be the restriction of to Then is an automorphism of fixing since for all hence, Next, we will show that the fixed field of is Let be an element in that is fixed by all automorphisms in In particular, for all Therefore, belongs to the fixed field of
Finally, we must show that when is a normal extension of
For let be the automorphism of obtained by restricting to Since is a normal extension, the argument in the preceding paragraph shows that Consequently, we have a map defined by This map is a group homomorphism since
The kernel of is By (2),
Hence, the image of is and is onto. Applying the First Isomorphism Theorem, we have
Example 23.25.
In this example we will illustrate the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory by determining the lattice of subgroups of the Galois group of We will compare this lattice to the lattice of field extensions of that are contained in the splitting field of The splitting field of is To see this, notice that factors as hence, the roots of are and We first adjoin the root to and then adjoin the root of to The splitting field of is then
is a basis of over The lattice of field extensions of contained in is illustrated in Figure 23.26(a).
The Galois group of must be of order Let be the automorphism defined by and and be the automorphism defined by complex conjugation; that is, Then has an element of order and an element of order It is easy to verify by direct computation that the elements of are and that the relations and are satisfied; hence, must be isomorphic to The lattice of subgroups of is illustrated in Figure 23.26(b).
Subsection Historical Note
Solutions for the cubic and quartic equations were discovered in the 1500s. Attempts to find solutions for the quintic equations puzzled some of historyโs best mathematicians. In 1798, P. Ruffini submitted a paper that claimed no such solution could be found; however, the paper was not well received. In 1826, Niels Henrik Abel (1802โ1829) finally offered the first correct proof that quintics are not always solvable by radicals.
Abel inspired the work of รvariste Galois. Born in 1811, Galois began to display extraordinary mathematical talent at the age of 14. He applied for entrance to the รcole Polytechnique several times; however, he had great difficulty meeting the formal entrance requirements, and the examiners failed to recognize his mathematical genius. He was finally accepted at the รcole Normale in 1829.
Galois worked to develop a theory of solvability for polynomials. In 1829, at the age of 17, Galois presented two papers on the solution of algebraic equations to the Acadรฉmie des Sciences de Paris. These papers were sent to Cauchy, who subsequently lost them. A third paper was submitted to Fourier, who died before he could read the paper. Another paper was presented, but was not published until 1846.
Galoisโ democratic sympathies led him into the Revolution of 1830. He was expelled from school and sent to prison for his part in the turmoil. After his release in 1832, he was drawn into a duel possibly over a love affair. Certain that he would be killed, he spent the evening before his death outlining his work and his basic ideas for research in a long letter to his friend Chevalier. He was indeed dead the next day, at the age of 20.